|
Home Up
| |
Taxes, Taxes, Taxes.............
- 25 Apr 08
Voters Will Have Say on Tax Cut in November
|
TALLAHASSEE:
Florida
voters
will
decide
in
November
whether
to cut
property
taxes by
about 25
percent
through
a
dramatic
shift in
the way
schools
are
funded.
But the
plan
would
lead to
a higher
state
sales
tax and
put
lawmakers
under
immense
pressure
to
replace
billions
in lost
school
taxes.
It was
placed
on the
ballot
Thursday
by a
powerful
tax
commission.
But
opposition
was
already
mounting
Thursday,
suggesting
a deeply
funded
campaign
to
defeat
the
measure
is in
the
making.
Business
groups
pilloried
the idea
as a
danger
to the
economy,
not only
through
a 1 cent
or more
sales
tax
increase,
but also
because
it
raises
the
possibility
of
taxing
services,
such as
for
lawyers
and
accountants.
The
measure
could
also
lead to
the
repeal
of some
special
interests'
sales
tax
exemptions.
[Source:
St.
Petersburg
Times] |
|
|
|
|
|
Property Tax ReformOn January 29, 2008, the
people of Florida voted in overwhelming numbers to save nearly $10
billion in property taxes with the approval of Amendment 1. This tax
relief is in addition to the $15 billion tax cut passed by the
Florida Legislature in 2007. Together, they add up to almost $25
billion in property-tax cuts over five years for Florida homeowners
and businesses.
For information about how to receive these new benefits, please
read below or visit the Department of Revenue’s Web site online at
www.myflorida.com/dor.
You may also wish to contact your local property appraiser’s office.
Citizens will gain the freedom to purchase a new home without
huge tax penalties. Rental home owners, second home owners and
businesses will benefit from limits on future tax increases. The
amendment contains two provisions that we have long advocated:
doubling the homestead exemption and the ability for Florida
families to take with them their Save Our Homes tax savings.
Specifically, the constitutional amendment:
- Doubles the homestead exemption for almost all homeowners,
providing an average savings of about $240 annually. The new
exemption applies fully to homesteads valued over $75,000, and
partially for homesteads valued between $50,000 and $75,000.
This new exemption does not apply to school taxes.
- Allows portability: The Governor has heard from many
Floridians that they feel trapped in their homes. Portability
allows homeowners to transfer their Save Our Homes tax benefits
from their current home to a newly purchased home within any
Florida county. Portability applies to homes purchased in 2007
and later, and the benefit is capped at $500,000.
- Provides an assessment cap of 10 percent for all properties
not previously capped: While homestead properties are already
capped at three percent, now all other properties, including
rental properties, second homes, and business properties, will
be protected from huge tax increases. This new exemption does
not apply to school taxes.
- Creates a new $25,000 exemption for business property,
including office furniture, computers, machinery and equipment.
The passage of Amendment 1 will help jump start Florida’s housing
market and make Florida even more business friendly. Again, I
encourage you to please read below or visit the Department of
Revenue’s Web site online at
www.myflorida.com/dor for information about how to receive these
new benefits.
Property Insurance Reform
Governor Crist understands the importance of making homeowners
insurance more affordable.
During the 2007 Special Session of the Florida Legislature, the
House and Senate passed comprehensive insurance reform legislation.
Governor Crist signed the legislation into law creating broad-based
and meaningful homeowner insurance rate reduction.
The new law mandates that insurance companies treat all
Floridians fairly. This important piece of insurance reform levels
the playing field and allows companies, including state-run Citizens
Insurance to compete for business. The legislation provides the
first step in eliminating cherry-picking – a practice where
insurance companies sell only profitable automobile insurance and do
not offer property insurance, which involves more risk. The law also
places more restrictions on nationwide companies whose Florida-only
subsidiaries raise rates while the parent companies generate
excessive profits.
Insurers are now required to pay claims in a timely manner and
are prevented from raising rates and dropping policies during
hurricane season. Companies must return excess profits and be
truthful with regulators about rate increases.
Floridians now have a choice. Insurers must provide coverage
options including the size of the deductible and whether or not
possessions will be covered. Homeowners can pay premiums in
installments and receive a return on the investment of hardening
their homes. An Insurance Consumer Advocate will provide a consumer
rating for each insurance company allowing Floridians to make more
educated decision when choosing an insurance company. Additionally
stronger building codes statewide eliminate regional exceptions to
the Uniform Building Code, with the goal of reducing the number of
buildings damaged or destroyed by a storm.
Passing this legislation gives us the tools to reach further.
This spring, Governor Crist will work with the House and Senate to
pass legislation that will lower property tax rates.
He supports doubling the Homestead Exemption and making the Save
Our Homes tax cap portable statewide. Governor Crist supports a
constitutional amendment to give counties the option by referendum
to double the Homestead Exemption from $25,000 to $50,000. Statewide
portability of the Save Our Homes tax cap will allow homeowners to
take their current tax rate with them and continue capping increases
at the lower rate when they move. He will seek a special election in
2007 to have these constitutional amendments placed on the ballot as
soon as possible.
_______________**_______________
| |
|
 |
|
|
For Immediate
Release:
January
24, 2008
Contact:
Vivian
Myrtetus
850-222-3767
NEWS FLASH
Orlando Sentinel
Our position: Florida's cities aren't telling the
truth about proposed property-tax cut
January 24,
2008
Florida's cities have stooped to a new low in their
effort to keep their fists wrapped tightly around your
property-tax dollars.
It's bad enough they trotted out firefighters and
cops and threatened to fire them if voters approve the Amendment
1 property-tax cut -- even though privately they admit that
won't happen.
Now it has gotten even sleazier. The Florida League
of Cities is lying about Amendment 1's impact on longtime
homeowners in a mailer sent to thousands of Floridians. The
mailer even goes so far as to try to scare senior citizens into
voting against Amendment 1
The mailer
features two photos designed to tick you off. One picture is of
a slick, arrogant "out-of-state property owner" standing in
front of an estate, giving two thumbs up. He's flashing a sly
grin. The other image is of two elderly "Florida homeowners"
standing in front of a modest house. They're frowning.
The
message: "He Gets a Great Deal" and "We Get a Raw Deal.
The truth
is Amendment 1 favors longtime homeowners over new home buyers.
About 75 percent of the $9.3 billion in savings projected over
the next five years would go to Florida homeowners.
In fact,
one of the chief arguments against Amendment 1 is that it treats
current homeowners better than others and worsens Florida's
already unfair tax system by making the Save Our Homes tax break
portable
Who says
that? Why, the same Florida League of Cities.
Here's a
quote from "Amendment #1: Why It's Wrong for Florida," posted on
the league's own Web site.
"The
amendment will further shift the property-tax burden from
homestead property to non-homestead," the white paper says. It
adds that first-time home buyers would be treated unfairly
whether Floridians or "whether it's a family relocating from
Ohio."
So which is
it? Would Amendment 1 stick it to poor Ohioans seeking a better
life, or poor seniors on fixed incomes.
Don't try
to get a straight answer from league Executive Director Mike
Sittig. A couple of weeks ago he argued Amendment 1 would force
cities to raise their tax rates, but then admitted that wasn't
really true. Instead of sticking it to the taxpayer, he
conceded, cities could actually set priorities and cut spending.
After all this, can you blame Floridians for not believing local
governments when they cry poor? Tax collections grew three times
faster than inflation and population combined over the past
decade. Where did the money go?
You'd be
surprised. The Sun-Sentinel in Fort Lauderdale reported that at
least six Broward County cities are using taxpayer money to send
out mailers about Amendment 1. City leaders say they aren't
trying to sway voters, but who are they kidding?
Tired of all this? Then send a message on Tuesday by
voting for Amendment 1.
Copyright ©
2008, Orlando Sentinel
###
|
|
|
Paid political advertisement paid for and sponsored by Yes on 1 – Save
our Homes NOW, Inc.
2640-A Mitcham Drive, Tallahassee, FL 32308. |
|
|
_________________**_____________________
Except from the Orlando Sentinel :
________________**_______________
14 Dec 07
A letter from Charlie Crist
|
|
 |
|
|
Dear Friends:
Today I was joined by a coalition of
homeowners, representatives from the business community and local
government officials in supporting Amendment 1 with the kick off the
�Yes on 1- Save our Homes NOW.� Like you, these individuals feel
Amendment 1 is a fair and simple solution to rising property taxes
and a diminishing housing market. I believe you know how to spend
your money better then the government does and you deserve to keep
more of it.
Joined by homeowners, Elizabeth and Keith
Markowitz, our coalition listened to their personal story as they
explained the benefits they would receive from the Amendment 1 tax
cuts. Like many Americans, the Markowitz�s had dreamed of building
their own home, but could not afford the higher property taxes they
would face. However, with the passage of Amendment 1, the Markowitz
family would be able to transfer more than $93,000 from their Save
our Homes portability benefit, saving nearly $2,000 on their annual
tax bill.
The Markowitz family is not alone and millions
of Floridians are trapped in their homes by rising property taxes.
With Amendment 1, Floridians will have to option to move, seniors
will be able to downsize, and business owners will find relief from
rising property values. The bottom line is citizens should not be
taxed out of their homes.
I would like to personally thank Steve Moreira,
president of the Orlando Regional Realtor Association, Mark Wilson,
executive vice president of the Florida Chamber and Barney Bishop,
President and CEO of The Associated Industries of Florida for
attending today�s event.
More importantly, I would like to thank you for
your continued support of Amendment 1. Without the voices of Florida
homeowners, Amendment 1 would only be an idea. Floridians have the
power to cut their property taxes in a historic way � vote �yes� on
1 this Election Day, January 29th.
To learn more about how Amendment 1 can lower
your taxes, visit
Yeson1Florida.com.
Sincerely,
|
|
|
  |
|
|
|
|
|
Paid political advertisement paid for and sponsored by Yes on 1 �
Save our Homes NOW, Inc.
2640-A Mitcham Drive, Tallahassee, FL 32308. |
|
|
__________**____________
- 16 Jun 07
tax plan
update
Dear Property Tax Reform Supporter:
Yesterday the Legislature passed a historic
property tax relief and reform package that
will cut property taxes for property owners
in Florida by almost $32 billion dollars
statewide over the next five years.
We have a simple message for Florida’s
property owners: help is on the way. The
$32 billion dollars in relief will make a
real difference in the lives of Floridians –
this isn’t just a first step forward, it is
the first giant leap forward – still, I
believe more can be done. There is more
waste that can be cut from government,
government can provide greater value to the
taxpayers, there are more taxpayer
protections that must be put in place, and
there are greater tax savings that this
Legislature can provide to Floridians.
The centerpiece of the plan is the
constitutional amendment that Florida voters
will vote on January 29, 2008. House Joint
Resolution 3B will provide the greatest
savings for Florida’s homeowners by creating
a “Super Homestead” exemption which will
provide an average 44% reduction on most
home-owners tax bills. The constitutional
amendment eliminates inequities in our
current property tax system, provides
Tangible Personal Property (TPP) tax relief
to Florida’s businesses and eliminates 77%
- more than $1 million – of Florida’s small
businesses from the TPP tax rolls, helps
businesses by pumping more money into our
economy, and helps non-homestead owners by
lowering the barriers to homeownership, and
lets property owners choose how their homes
will be taxed in the future.
The property tax relief and reform package
approved yesterday also includes a statutory
tax relief bill, House Bill 1B, that will
immediately cut taxes and cap future tax
increases for all property owners; limit
local governments’ ability to unnecessarily
raise taxes in the future; and provide
immediate savings to homeowners, second
homeowners, and commercial property owners.
The only limits to our future success as a
state are the unfair limits government
applies to our people through unnecessary
taxation – it will be the charge of the
House of Representatives, as long as I
preside over it, to destroy those barriers
to prosperity.
Sincerely,
Marco Rubio
Speaker, Florida House of Representatives
The bills approved yesterday:
HJR 3B by Representative Cannon “Property
Tax: Constitutional Relief & Reform”
-
Offers $16 billion of tax relief over
five years.
The savings by property type in 2008
are:
-
Average Homestead switching from Save
Our Homes: 44% ($1,306)
-
Average Non-homestead Residential: 8%
($245)
-
Average Commercial/Industrial: 8%
($1,240)
-
Average Tangible Personal Property
savings: 17% ($262)
-
Allows homeowners to choose between Save
Our Homes or the new plan.
-
No one will lose their current Save Our
Homes protections unless they choose to.
-
Homeowners will be allowed to choose
between their current Save Our Homes
protections or the new, “Super
Homestead” and expanded taxpayer
protections under the constitutional
amendment.
-
This creates a form of portability for
homeowners who would otherwise lose
significant tax savings when they move.
-
Rather than starting over with only a
$25,000 homestead exemption and zero
Save Our Homes protections, the
homeowner would immediately have a
homestead exemption up to $195,000 as
soon as they move in.
-
Creates a new “Super Homestead”
exemption to transform the inequitable
Florida property tax system.
-
The new exemption covers 75% of the
first $200,000 of value and 15% of the
next $300,000.
-
Thus, the maximum super exemption is
$195,000.
-
All
homesteads will receive at least a
$50,000 exemption.
-
Qualifying low-income seniors will
receive at least a $100,000 exemption.
-
The upper $500,000 threshold is indexed
to grow with changes in Florida personal
income, which generally increases 4% per
year.
-
Authorizes a new $25,000 Tangible
Personal Property (TPP) exemption for
businesses.
-
This creates immediate savings of
hundreds of dollars for TPP-paying
business owners.
-
It also eliminates the administrative
burden of filing a tax return for $1
million of Florida’s 1.3 million
businesses that pay tangible personal.
-
Authorizes targeted relief for
affordable housing and working
waterfront properties. Implements tax
reform and relief for 2008 tax bills,
provided the Legislature votes for a
special election in January 2008 (HB
5B).
HB 1B
by Representative Attkisson
“Property
Tax: Immediate Statutory Relief”
-
Creates meaningful and immediate tax
relief for all properties in
Florida this year.
-
Homestead
property owners save an average of 7%
($174).
-
Non-homestead residential property
owners save an average of 7% ($199).
-
Commercial/industrial property owners
save an average of 6% ($941).
-
Tangible personal property taxpayers
save an average of 6% ($92).
-
Requires all local governments except
school districts to cut taxes
this year.
-
First, cities, counties, and independent
special districts must reduce taxes for
the 2007-2008 Fiscal Year by adopting
the 2006-2007 tax levy, adjusted for new
construction (i.e., adopt the
rolled-back rate).
-
Next, cities and counties must further
reduce taxes by a factor based on
whether they have recently levied
property taxes responsibly or
excessively, compared to a statewide
average. The reduction factor will be
3%, 5%, 7%, or 9%.
-
All independent special districts are
required to implement the 3% reduction
factor.
-
Requires all local governments except
school districts to cap annual
property tax revenue growth.
-
Property tax revenue growth will only be
allowed to increase in proportion to
population growth (i.e., new
construction) and growth of Florida
personal income (which averages 4%
annually).
-
A
revenue cap creates unprecedented
protections for all Florida
properties
– especially
commercial properties and non-homestead
residential properties, which currently
have no specific protection.
-
Protects taxpayers while allowing local
flexibility by requiring a rigorous
procedure to override the required
revenue cap.
-
Depending on the extent to which the
local authority wants to exceed the
revenue cap, varying supermajority votes
are required.
-
A slight increase requires a 2/3 vote,
while a larger increase will require
either a unanimous vote or approval by
local voters.
-
Implements provisions authorized in the
constitutional reform plan (HJR 3B).
-
The implemented provisions are:
-
The new “super” homestead exemption.
-
The new homestead exemption for
low-income seniors.
-
The grandfathering provisions that allow
certain homeowners to maintain Save Our
Homes benefits.
-
Homeowners will be allowed to choose
between their current Save Our Homes
protections or the new, “Super
Homestead” and expanded taxpayer
protections under the constitutional
amendment.
-
The new tax protections for affordable
housing.
|
|
|
|
_______________**________________
Q&A: Lower bill won't arrive for months
By the St. Petersburg
Times staff
Published June 15, 2007
When will I see lower taxes?
In November, the tax bill you get will be an
average of about 7 percent lower than it was last year. This
is the result of the rollback plan and tax cap that was
approved by lawmakers Thursday. It requires local
governments to reduce their tax collections.
I thought the plan was in trouble. What happened?
The rollback plan never was in trouble, but the
proposal to create a new "superhomestead" exemption to
replace Save Our Homes had drawn skepticism from some GOP
senators. Very late Wednesday night, lawmakers agreed to one
final change that provided the comfort the skeptics needed
to support the new homestead plan, and they did.
That change will allow homeowners to decide between
keeping the existing Save Our Homes tax cap, which favors
longtime owners, and the new superhomestead, which would
offer the best tax breaks for relative newcomers.
So, is it all done?
Not exactly. The rollback needs only the signature
of Gov. Charlie Crist, who will likely sign it soon, but the
homestead exemption change must be approved by Florida
voters. It will appear on the ballot Jan. 29, the day
Florida holds its presidential primary.
However, since it's an amendment to the state
Constitution, the new homestead plan will have to win a 60
percent majority, which is a very high threshold. Not many
constitutional amendments have been that popular.
So, how would the superhomestead exemption work?
Under the proposal, 75 percent of the first $200,
000 in home value would be exempt from taxation. Then
another 15 percent of the next $300, 000 in home value would
be tax exempt. A minimum exemption of $50, 000 would be
guaranteed for homes worth less than $200, 000, and a
maximum exemption of $195, 000 would guaranteed for homes
worth more than $500, 000.
When will I get to decide between keeping Save
Our Homes and taking the new superhomestead?
Not until after the Jan. 29 election. If voters
approve the new superhomestead, then homeowners will have a
decision to make.
How will that process work?
The details are still to be ironed out, but here's what we
know: The Save Our Homes exemption will remain on your house
until you decide to switch. If you want to have the
superhomestead applied to your house, you will have to
contact county officials, probably your tax collector, and
let them know. But, once you've switched to the new
homestead, you won't be able to switch back.
How long would I be able to keep Save Our Homes?
For as long as you live in your house. Once you
move, you would lose your Save Our Homes exemption and you
would be switched to the new superhomestead.
How will I decide between taking the new
superexemption and sticking with Save Our Homes?
That's a tricky question. For most homeowners, the
new exemption would lower your tax bill right away. But it
is possible that Save Our Homes could be a better deal on
your tax bill over the long term. Even though the new
homestead exemption offers a steep cut in the taxable value
on your home, that may not be as beneficial as having the
Save Our Homes cap, especially in areas where property
values are likely to keep rising.
When they talk about "rolling back" taxes for
cities and counties, what exactly would get rolled back?
The "rollback" refers to the revenue that cities
and counties collect from property taxes; it's not the
entire budget. Local governments also raise money through
such things as fees and franchise agreements with cable
companies, which wouldn't be affected. Still, property taxes
are an enormous part of a local government's revenue stream,
and property taxes also fund an array of specialty taxing
districts for such things as mosquito control and hospital
service. All of those tax-raising groups would have to roll
back their tax rates.
What about school districts?
School districts would be exempt from the rollback.
How much money would I get back under the
rollback?
There are tons of variables for individuals because
each city and county has many different taxing districts
with many different tax rates. But lawmakers have calculated
a statewide average of $174 for homeowners. Commercial land
owners would save $941.
Can my local government refuse to lower my tax
bill and override these plans?
Yes, but it's difficult. Depending on the cuts they
want to override, they will need anywhere between a simple
majority to a unanimous vote. Also, if they want to raise
your taxes, they would have to ask first by a public
referendum.
|
|
____________**_____________
- 09 Jun 07
A tax plan with specifics
Legislators propose rollbacks and expanded exemptions.
By ALEX LEARY and JENNIFER LIBERTO
The St. Petersburg Times
TALLAHASSEE -- Top lawmakers proposed the largest tax cut in
Florida history Friday, a sprawling $31.6-billion plan that
would trim the average bill by 7 percent this year and
give homeowners significantly lower taxes in future
years.
The five-year plan -- a blueprint for the special session
that begins Tuesday -- was released just before 6 p.m. as a
blizzard of numbers that seemed more reasonable than many had
expected.
"You always fear the worst, but I'm pleasantly surprised and
optimistic," said Pinellas County Commissioner Susan Latvala,
who as president of the Florida Association of Counties has been
a leading voice against drastic tax reductions.
"I think they listened to us, and they realize local
governments provide vital services," she said.
The plan has two major components. One is a rollback of tax
revenues for local governments, and the other is a sharp
expansion of the state's homestead exemption.
The two pieces represent a hard-fought compromise between
Senate President Ken Pruitt, who wanted to cut taxes more
modestly, and House Speaker Marco Rubio, who wanted to swing a
meat cleaver.
Gov. Charlie Crist praised the effort.
"It's looking very good to me," said Crist, who had earlier
called for about $30-billion in cuts. "I'm very pleased and very
grateful."
But the early optimism did not mask a concern, especially
among business owners, that the plan is designed to give the
biggest cuts to homesteaded property owners, who already enjoy
exemptions under the current system.
It was commercial landowners, snowbirds and landlords who
cried the loudest last summer for a break in property taxes
because their bills have risen fastest. Yet, almost two-thirds
of the new savings go to homesteaders.
"It seems that the leadership in Tallahassee is unable to
grasp a simple principle," said 60-year-old Marty Altner of
Clearwater, a landlord and tax reform advocate. "An EMS worker
helps someone who is bleeding to death before someone with a
flesh wound. It's idiocy."
And there were new fears Friday about cuts to local school
budgets. While Pruitt and Rubio pledged to hold schools harmless
in the tax deal, the proposal would cut school budgets by
$7.1-billion over the next five years. Lawmakers will have to
find a way to replace that money.
"This is very unsettling and gives us a queasy feeling," said
Mark Pudlow, spokesman for the Florida Education Association.
"It's kind of 'trust us' deal."
- - -
The biggest challenge politically will be winning approval in
the Legislature for the new "super" homestead exemption.
Tinkering with the homestead exemption, available only to
primary residences, means changing the state Constitution. That
requires a three-fourths majority in the House and Senate, plus
voter approval.
Under the proposal released Friday, the current $25,000 flat
exemption would be replaced by a system that provides a 75
percent exemption on the first $200,000 in home value. The next
$300,000 would get an additional 15 percent exemption. So a home
valued at $400,000 would be taxed on only $220,000.
A minimum exemption of $50,000 would be guaranteed.
Longtime homeowners who already have especially low tax bills
because of the Save Our Homes cap on annual assessments would be
allowed to keep their existing tax bill.
But passage is hardly a done deal. If lawmakers can agree
during the special session, the proposal must still get 60
percent approval in a statewide referendum, tentatively
scheduled for Jan. 29, the day of the presidential primary.
The heavy focus on homestead property owners could give rise
to opposition from business groups who feel slighted. Aside from
the local government rollback, businesses get relatively few
benefits, including an exemption of $25, 000 in taxes on
equipment.
The local government tax rate rollback will be easier to
enact because it requires only a straight majority vote of the
Legislature before being sent to the governor. Under the
proposal, property tax revenues for city and county budgets for
the coming fiscal year 2007-2008, which begins Oct. 1, would
freeze at the current year's level.
Each local government would also have to make additional cuts
to their property tax revenues of either 3, 5, 7 or 9 percent,
depending on how much they had raised taxes between 2001 and
2006.
The rollback plan would generate an average saving for all
property owners of about 6 or 7 percent in the first year.
Future tax revenue growth would be capped by the rate of
personal income growth and population in a city or county. City
and county elected officials could break the limitations through
a supermajority vote.
While supporting the homestead exemptions, Democrats said the
plan could still be doomed if the school budget problem isn't
fixed.
"Now the state is going to step in and do the right thing?"
asked Rep. Jack Seiler of Wilton Manors. "You're asking the
taxpayers to take a leap of faith."
Times staff writers Steve Bousquet and Will Van Sant
contributed to this report.
Fast facts: Homestead expansion
Lawmakers are proposing a new "super" homestead exemption.
Here's how it would work:
- Primary homes would get a tax exemption of 75 percent of
the first $200,000 of the home's value, with a minimum
exemption of $50,000.
- The next $300,000 in value will get an additional 15
percent exemption.
- Other details: homeowners whose tax bills are lower
under the existing Save Our Homes program would be
"grandfathered in" to keep the lower tax bill.
Fast facts: Proposed rollbacks
Lawmakers propose creating a five-tier system for
rolling back city and county government budgets that follows a
basic principle: The more a local government allowed taxes to
rise with property values between 2001 and 2006, the steeper the
rollback. Here's where local counties and cities would fare:
0 percent rollback: St. Leo, Belleair Shore
and Temple Terrace
3 percent rollback: Pasco County and Safety
Harbor
5 percent rollback: Hillsborough County,
Indian Rocks Beach, Seminole, Plant City, Tampa, Pinellas Park,
St. Petersburg, Tarpon Springs and Belleair
7 percent rollback: Pinellas County, South
Pasadena, Kenneth City Dunedin, Port Richey, Clearwater and
Oldsmar
9 percent rollback: Hernando County,
Belleair Bluffs, San Antonio, Gulfport, St. Pete Beach, North
Redington Beach, Belleair Beach, Largo, Madeira Beach, Treasure
Island, Redington Beach, Redington Shores, Indian Shores and
Weeki Wachee |
|
_____________**_____________
Dear Property Tax Reform Supporter:
I am excited to announce that an agreement
has been reached between the House and the
Senate on the tax cut levels for historic
relief and reform package that will save
Florida taxpayers $31.6 billion
over the next five years. This is, by far,
the largest tax cut in Florida’s history.
I cannot be more proud of the excellent work
of our negotiating team and the valuable
input from our respective legislative
chambers. Together, we are bringing forth a
thoughtful and comprehensive plan that will
give every property owner – homestead,
non-homestead residential, and
commercial/industrial – a tax cut this
year. We are confident that when this
plan is implemented, Floridians will finally
have a more equitable tax system that will
yield property tax bills that they can
afford to pay.
The details of the plan are provided below.
Thank you for continued involvement in this
very important issue. Please e-mail us at
info@nomorepropertytax.com
for more information.
Sincerely,
Marco Rubio
Speaker, Florida House of Representatives
$15.6 billion in Immediate Tax Relief and
Reform (Statutory Changes)
-
Beginning this year, every category of
property taxpayer will benefit from the
cut and the cap that the statute
imposes.
-
All cities and counties will be required
to cut taxes in the upcoming 2007-2008
fiscal year to the 2006-2007 revenue
levels. These local governments will
then be required to make an additional
cut of 3%, 5%, 7% or 9%. The level of
cuts will be determined by a formula
that analyzes their taxing performance
over the past 5 years, measured against
a statewide average.
-
Special taxing districts and fiscally
limited cities and counties will be
required to cut taxes to the 2006-2007
revenue levels and make an additional
cut of 3%.
-
A cap on future property tax revenues
(based on the rate of personal income
growth and new construction) will be
imposed to ensure that government cannot
grow faster than personal income.
-
Local governments may override the cut
and the cap. The method for the
override will vary based on the
magnitude of the local government’s
action (escalating from a supermajority
vote of the local governing body, to a
unanimous vote of the local governing
body, to a referendum).
$16 billion in Further Tax Relief and Reform
(Constitutional Amendment)
-
The estimated average savings for a
homestead property (combining statutory
and constitutional changes) will be
$1,300 in 2008-2009. This average
savings represents a 44% reduction.
-
“Save our Homes” is replaced with a new
“super exemption”. An estimated 73% of
homesteaded properties will receive a
greater benefit under this new
exemption.
-
The new “super exemption” will be as
follows:
-
Level 1: Homestead Property will
receive an exemption of 75% of the
first $200,000 in value of the
home. The minimum exemption is
$50,000 per homestead.
-
Level 2: In addition to Level 1,
homestead property will obtain
another 15% exemption for the next
$300,000 in value.
-
We will grandfather the tax savings and
assessment cap for the minority of
property owners who have greater
benefits under the current “Save our
Homes” plan.
-
We will preserve all existing
constitutional exemptions based on
special circumstances, including those
now provided to disabled veterans, low
income seniors and agricultural lands.
-
Because the tax base for all taxing
authorities will decline under the
constitutional amendment, the fiscal
analyses reflects a reduction in school
funding. We intend to hold schools
harmless from these cuts.
Other Constitutional Changes
There has been agreement to address
remaining issues such as additional relief
to low income elderly taxpayers, offering
incentives for affordable housing and
providing tax reform for “working
waterfronts” and small businesses. Small
businesses will receive a $25,000 tangible
personal property tax (TPP) exemption
resulting in a total exemption for $1
million of the 1.3 million businesses who
must pay this tax. Furthermore, those who
receive a total exemption on their TPP will
never have to file the burdensome paperwork
associated with the tax again.
|
|
|
|
___________**_______________
- May 16, 2007 Inside
Florida's 'Tax Revolt'
Soaring Property Taxes Have Many in the Sunshine
State Demanding Change
Homeowners in Florida — a state with no
income tax — have been particularly hard hit
by rising property taxes.Tax assessors base
their judgments on real estate values, and
in Florida, in just the last three years,
property taxes have shot up about 50 percent
statewide. (Preston C. Mack/Getty Images)
From Nightline
By CHRIS BURY and MARY-CLAUDE FOSTER
as shown May 16, 2007 on ABC's Nightline
E-mail
Print
Florida. The Sunshine State. America's own
tropical delight — beautiful people with even more
beautiful homes. But if you look behind that
postcard image, you may find real trouble brewing in
paradise.
In Florida, a storm is gathering over the state's
soaring property taxes.
"If you have a significant difference between how
much your taxes are going up and how much your
income is going up, that is going to create a crisis
very fast," said Marco Rubio, the state's young and
ambitious speaker of the house. Over lunch with
constituents in Miami, Rubio received an earful of
complaints.
"I'm going to be working, I figure, 'til I'm 75
to pay my taxes," said Carol Kahn, a retired
teacher.
Another constituent, Ignacio Mendez, said, "My
tax base has gone up three times. I used to pay
$4,000 and now I'm paying $12,000 a year in taxes."
And that, in a nutshell, is the crisis that now
dominates the conversation in Florida. And drives
the political career of Rubio, a 35-year-old
Republican.
"It's the biggest issue in the state," he
explained. "Usually people come to Florida to run
away from the hassles, the cost of living of where
they were from. And now they're telling us, 'You
know, this is starting to look like the place that I
came here to get away from,' and that's not the kind
of talk we want to hear."
'Impossible to Move'
This problem is not unique to the Sunshine State.
Tax protests are popping up in Michigan, Minnesota
and Virginia, and testimonials from agitated
homeowners are flooding the Internet.
But property owners in Florida — a state with no
income tax — have been particularly hard hit. Tax
assessors base their judgments on real estate
values, and in Florida, in just the last three
years, property taxes have shot up about 50 percent
statewide as home prices have jumped.
Lori Parrish, the Broward County property
appraiser, said that she has never seen taxpayers so
angry. "I think the citizens are about to revolt in
a way that you've never seen," she said. "[They are]
fed up. And I think fed up with government spending
in general — you can't outspend the public's ability
to pay."
Those higher tax bills have left thousands of
middle-class families financially trapped in their
current homes.
"We bought our house 11 years ago," said Evan
Feldman, who would like to trade up for the sake of
his growing family, "and it's usually your starter
house, you never think it's the house you could be
in for 25, 30 years."
"It's a three bedroom house and we'd like to have
a second child," said Laurie Feldman, Evan's wife,
"and with the taxes, it makes it almost impossible
to move."
The Feldmans said they feel trapped because, like
all permanent Florida residents, their home property
tax bills are capped to avoid dramatic increases.
But only if they stay put. "We're not asking to go
from something that's 1,600 square feet to something
that's 3, 4, 5,000 square feet," said Evan. "These
are people like myself that are looking for a couple
of hundred square feet more, and they do feel
trapped."
Middle Class Pushed Out
In Florida, a new owner of a home could easily
pay three times more in property taxes than the
owner of an identical home next door, who has lived
there for several years.
"Soon, the only people who are going to be living
here are the millionaires because the middle class
are being pushed out," said Feldman. "The first time
home buyers, pushed out. Retirees that want to
downsize can't."
The higher taxes have their roots in a real
estate market that began booming in 2004.
"Our sales prices for properties in 2004 to 2005
skyrocketed," said Parrish. "I mean there were
bidding wars to pay more by buyers than the sellers
were asking."
Then came the hurricanes. "Katrina came in the
fall of 2005 and that slowed it back and then Wilma
hit in October 2005 and devastated south Florida and
Broward county," said Parrish. "People as far as 20
miles from the ocean had lost their roofs, fences —
all sorts of damage."
All of a sudden, property owners were facing a
double whammy: high taxes and higher insurance
payments.
"The first insurance
renewal premiums after
Wilma
skyrocketed…tripled,
doubled, quadrupled.
Scared people…" said
Parrish. "The tax bills
that people received in
2005 and 2006 were
astronomical."
Hitting Bottom
After the hurricanes,
the market cooled off
quickly, and in Miami, a
glut of unsold
condominiums hangs over
the city like a dark
cloud.
"Yes, the real estate
market was devastated,"
said Parrish.
"Absolutely, the market
was devastated, it hit
bottom."
Now, the stalled real
estate sales are also
dragging down businesses
that depend on housing
just as their property
tax bills have also shot
through the roof.
All this has led
Florida legislators like
Rubio to consider
radical changes. "I
think the property tax
is a horrible way to tax
people," he said.
Rubio proposes
eliminating the property
tax and replacing it
with a higher sales tax,
an idea that ran into
trouble when Democrats
argued it would give the
biggest breaks to the
wealthiest homeowners.
Across Florida, local
governments like the
city of Delray Beach in
Palm Beach County that
have been raking in big
bucks are now bracing
for big budget cuts.
"I'm not saying we
can't do without any of
it," said David Harden,
Delray Beach's city
manager. "Think about
your own family
situation. How would you
manage if your income
suddenly dropped by 25
percent."
Some Cities
Threaten Pushback
The city has already
published a "hit list"
of services it is
threatening to reduce or
eliminate if property
taxes are cut back. That
list includes nearly two
dozen cops, fire station
cutbacks, a brand new
library, swimming pools,
and even lifeguards at
the beach. Rubio said he
doesn't endorse these
actions.
"That would be like
my wife saying we're
going to cut diapers and
baby formula if I were
to get a pay cut
yesterday. Those are the
last things you cut. And
it shows what's wrong
with the system," he
said.
But would the Feldman
family be willing to
accept fewer services,
poorer schools, or fewer
firemen in exchange for
lower taxes?
"Well, I don't know
if our school systems
could get any poorer,"
said Laurie Feldman.
"And I have to ask the
government, 'Where are
all those tax dollars
going?' A lot of my
friends and neighbors
are moving, reluctantly,
to other states when
they would prefer to
stay here. And they
can't afford it."
So, one way or another,
the costs of living in
paradise are going up.
The painful choices
ahead point to a
showdown in the Sunshine
State. And the bigger
question is how far the
tax revolt now under way
there may spread.
|