Concerned Friends of Fernandina                                

                                                                    wpe3.jpg (29730 bytes)Copy of Downtown Streets.gif (83100 bytes)        

                              Concerned Friends of Fernandina is a grassroots citizens group formed to inform and involve

                             residents wanting to preserve the small town  identity of Fernandina Beach and its natural beauty.

Home Up

                                   "With public sentiment, nothing can fail;  without it nothing can succeed." -- Abraham Lincoln

 

                 

   

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home
Up
                   

 

Taxes, Taxes, Taxes.............

  • 25 Apr 08 Voters Will Have Say on Tax Cut in November
TALLAHASSEE:


Florida voters will decide in November whether to cut property taxes by about 25 percent through a dramatic shift in the way schools are funded. But the plan would lead to a higher state sales tax and put lawmakers under immense pressure to replace billions in lost school taxes. It was placed on the ballot Thursday by a powerful tax commission. But opposition was already mounting Thursday, suggesting a deeply funded campaign to defeat the measure is in the making. Business groups pilloried the idea as a danger to the economy, not only through a 1 cent or more sales tax increase, but also because it raises the possibility of taxing services, such as for lawyers and accountants. The measure could also lead to the repeal of some special interests' sales tax exemptions. [Source: St. Petersburg Times]

 

  • 28 Mar 08
Property Tax Reform

On January 29, 2008, the people of Florida voted in overwhelming numbers to save nearly $10 billion in property taxes with the approval of Amendment 1. This tax relief is in addition to the $15 billion tax cut passed by the Florida Legislature in 2007. Together, they add up to almost $25 billion in property-tax cuts over five years for Florida homeowners and businesses.

For information about how to receive these new benefits, please read below or visit the Department of Revenue’s Web site online at www.myflorida.com/dor. You may also wish to contact your local property appraiser’s office.

Citizens will gain the freedom to purchase a new home without huge tax penalties. Rental home owners, second home owners and businesses will benefit from limits on future tax increases. The amendment contains two provisions that we have long advocated: doubling the homestead exemption and the ability for Florida families to take with them their Save Our Homes tax savings.

Specifically, the constitutional amendment:

  1. Doubles the homestead exemption for almost all homeowners, providing an average savings of about $240 annually. The new exemption applies fully to homesteads valued over $75,000, and partially for homesteads valued between $50,000 and $75,000. This new exemption does not apply to school taxes.
  2. Allows portability: The Governor has heard from many Floridians that they feel trapped in their homes. Portability allows homeowners to transfer their Save Our Homes tax benefits from their current home to a newly purchased home within any Florida county. Portability applies to homes purchased in 2007 and later, and the benefit is capped at $500,000.
  3. Provides an assessment cap of 10 percent for all properties not previously capped: While homestead properties are already capped at three percent, now all other properties, including rental properties, second homes, and business properties, will be protected from huge tax increases. This new exemption does not apply to school taxes.
  4. Creates a new $25,000 exemption for business property, including office furniture, computers, machinery and equipment.

The passage of Amendment 1 will help jump start Florida’s housing market and make Florida even more business friendly. Again, I encourage you to please read below or visit the Department of Revenue’s Web site online at www.myflorida.com/dor for information about how to receive these new benefits.


Property Insurance Reform

Governor Crist understands the importance of making homeowners insurance more affordable.

During the 2007 Special Session of the Florida Legislature, the House and Senate passed comprehensive insurance reform legislation. Governor Crist signed the legislation into law creating broad-based and meaningful homeowner insurance rate reduction.

The new law mandates that insurance companies treat all Floridians fairly. This important piece of insurance reform levels the playing field and allows companies, including state-run Citizens Insurance to compete for business. The legislation provides the first step in eliminating cherry-picking – a practice where insurance companies sell only profitable automobile insurance and do not offer property insurance, which involves more risk. The law also places more restrictions on nationwide companies whose Florida-only subsidiaries raise rates while the parent companies generate excessive profits.

Insurers are now required to pay claims in a timely manner and are prevented from raising rates and dropping policies during hurricane season. Companies must return excess profits and be truthful with regulators about rate increases.

Floridians now have a choice. Insurers must provide coverage options including the size of the deductible and whether or not possessions will be covered. Homeowners can pay premiums in installments and receive a return on the investment of hardening their homes. An Insurance Consumer Advocate will provide a consumer rating for each insurance company allowing Floridians to make more educated decision when choosing an insurance company. Additionally stronger building codes statewide eliminate regional exceptions to the Uniform Building Code, with the goal of reducing the number of buildings damaged or destroyed by a storm.

Passing this legislation gives us the tools to reach further. This spring, Governor Crist will work with the House and Senate to pass legislation that will lower property tax rates.

He supports doubling the Homestead Exemption and making the Save Our Homes tax cap portable statewide. Governor Crist supports a constitutional amendment to give counties the option by referendum to double the Homestead Exemption from $25,000 to $50,000. Statewide portability of the Save Our Homes tax cap will allow homeowners to take their current tax rate with them and continue capping increases at the lower rate when they move. He will seek a special election in 2007 to have these constitutional amendments placed on the ballot as soon as possible.

                                                                                                      _______________**_______________

 

  • 24 Jan 08
 
 

 

 

 
 
For Immediate Release:                                     
January 24, 2008                                                                            
Contact:         Vivian Myrtetus 
 
850-222-3767                                                                                                   
 
NEWS FLASH
Orlando Sentinel
 

Our position: Florida's cities aren't telling the truth about proposed property-tax cut


January 24, 2008

Florida's cities have stooped to a new low in their effort to keep their fists wrapped tightly around your property-tax dollars.

It's bad enough they trotted out firefighters and cops and threatened to fire them if voters approve the Amendment 1 property-tax cut -- even though privately they admit that won't happen.

Now it has gotten even sleazier. The Florida League of Cities is lying about Amendment 1's impact on longtime homeowners in a mailer sent to thousands of Floridians. The mailer even goes so far as to try to scare senior citizens into voting against Amendment 1
 

The mailer features two photos designed to tick you off. One picture is of a slick, arrogant "out-of-state property owner" standing in front of an estate, giving two thumbs up. He's flashing a sly grin. The other image is of two elderly "Florida homeowners" standing in front of a modest house. They're frowning.

The message: "He Gets a Great Deal" and "We Get a Raw Deal.
 

The truth is Amendment 1 favors longtime homeowners over new home buyers. About 75 percent of the $9.3 billion in savings projected over the next five years would go to Florida homeowners.

In fact, one of the chief arguments against Amendment 1 is that it treats current homeowners better than others and worsens Florida's already unfair tax system by making the Save Our Homes tax break portable
 

Who says that? Why, the same Florida League of Cities.

Here's a quote from "Amendment #1: Why It's Wrong for Florida," posted on the league's own Web site.
 

"The amendment will further shift the property-tax burden from homestead property to non-homestead," the white paper says. It adds that first-time home buyers would be treated unfairly whether Floridians or "whether it's a family relocating from Ohio."

So which is it? Would Amendment 1 stick it to poor Ohioans seeking a better life, or poor seniors on fixed incomes.
 

Don't try to get a straight answer from league Executive Director Mike Sittig. A couple of weeks ago he argued Amendment 1 would force cities to raise their tax rates, but then admitted that wasn't really true. Instead of sticking it to the taxpayer, he conceded, cities could actually set priorities and cut spending.
 

After all this, can you blame Floridians for not believing local governments when they cry poor? Tax collections grew three times faster than inflation and population combined over the past decade. Where did the money go?

You'd be surprised. The Sun-Sentinel in Fort Lauderdale reported that at least six Broward County cities are using taxpayer money to send out mailers about Amendment 1. City leaders say they aren't trying to sway voters, but who are they kidding?

Tired of all this? Then send a message on Tuesday by voting for Amendment 1.

Copyright © 2008, Orlando Sentinel

 
###

 

 
Paid political advertisement paid for and sponsored by Yes on 1 – Save our Homes NOW, Inc.
2640-A Mitcham Drive, Tallahassee, FL 32308.

 

 



 

                                                                    _________________**_____________________

 

  • December 17, 2007

Except from the Orlando Sentinel :

 
 
 

                                             ________________**_______________

14 Dec 07 A letter from Charlie Crist

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends:  

Today I was joined by a coalition of homeowners, representatives from the business community and local government officials in supporting Amendment 1 with the kick off the �Yes on 1- Save our Homes NOW.�  Like you, these individuals feel Amendment 1 is a fair and simple solution to rising property taxes and a diminishing housing market. I believe you know how to spend your money better then the government does and you deserve to keep more of it.
 

Joined by homeowners, Elizabeth and Keith Markowitz, our coalition listened to their personal story as they explained the benefits they would receive from the Amendment 1 tax cuts. Like many Americans, the Markowitz�s had dreamed of building their own home, but could not afford the higher property taxes they would face. However, with the passage of Amendment 1, the Markowitz family would be able to transfer more than $93,000 from their Save our Homes portability benefit, saving nearly $2,000 on their annual tax bill.  
 

The Markowitz family is not alone and millions of Floridians are trapped in their homes by rising property taxes. With Amendment 1, Floridians will have to option to move, seniors will be able to downsize, and business owners will find relief from rising property values. The bottom line is citizens should not be taxed out of their homes.
 

I would like to personally thank Steve Moreira, president of the Orlando Regional Realtor Association, Mark Wilson, executive vice president of the Florida Chamber and Barney Bishop, President and CEO of The Associated Industries of Florida for attending today�s event.
 

More importantly, I would like to thank you for your continued support of Amendment 1. Without the voices of Florida homeowners, Amendment 1 would only be an idea. Floridians have the power to cut their property taxes in a historic way � vote �yes� on 1 this Election Day, January 29th.
 

To learn more about how Amendment 1 can lower your taxes, visit Yeson1Florida.com.
 

Sincerely,


 

 


 

 

 
 

 

 
Paid political advertisement paid for and sponsored by Yes on 1 � Save our Homes NOW, Inc.
2640-A Mitcham Drive, Tallahassee, FL 32308.

 

 


 

                                                                                                 __________**____________

 

  • 16 Jun 07  tax plan update

Dear Property Tax Reform Supporter:

 

Yesterday the Legislature passed a historic property tax relief and reform package that will cut property taxes for property owners in Florida by almost $32 billion dollars statewide over the next five years.

 

We have a simple message for Florida’s property owners: help is on the way.  The $32 billion dollars in relief will make a real difference in the lives of Floridians – this isn’t just a first step forward, it is the first giant leap forward – still, I believe more can be done. There is more waste that can be cut from government, government can provide greater value to the taxpayers, there are more taxpayer protections that must be put in place, and there are greater tax savings that this Legislature can provide to Floridians.

  

The centerpiece of the plan is the constitutional amendment that Florida voters will vote on January 29, 2008. House Joint Resolution 3B will provide the greatest savings for Florida’s homeowners by creating a “Super Homestead” exemption which will provide an average 44% reduction on most home-owners tax bills. The constitutional amendment eliminates inequities in our current property tax system, provides Tangible Personal Property (TPP) tax relief to Florida’s businesses and eliminates 77%  - more than $1 million – of Florida’s small businesses from the TPP tax rolls, helps businesses by pumping more money into our economy, and helps non-homestead owners by lowering the barriers to homeownership, and lets property owners choose how their homes will be taxed in the future.

 

The property tax relief and reform package approved yesterday also includes a statutory tax relief bill, House Bill 1B, that will immediately cut taxes and cap future tax increases for all property owners; limit local governments’ ability to unnecessarily raise taxes in the future; and provide immediate savings to homeowners, second homeowners, and commercial property owners.

 

The only limits to our future success as a state are the unfair limits government applies to our people through unnecessary taxation – it will be the charge of the House of Representatives, as long as I preside over it, to destroy those barriers to prosperity.

 

Sincerely,

 

Marco Rubio

Speaker, Florida House of Representatives

 

 

The bills approved yesterday:

 

HJR 3B by Representative Cannon “Property Tax: Constitutional Relief & Reform”

 

  • Offers $16 billion of tax relief over five years.

The savings by property type in 2008 are:

  • Average Homestead switching from Save Our Homes: 44% ($1,306)
  • Average Non-homestead Residential: 8% ($245)
  • Average Commercial/Industrial: 8% ($1,240)
  • Average Tangible Personal Property savings: 17% ($262)

 

  • Allows homeowners to choose between Save Our Homes or the new plan.
  • No one will lose their current Save Our Homes protections unless they choose to.
  • Homeowners will be allowed to choose between their current Save Our Homes protections or the new, “Super Homestead” and expanded taxpayer protections under the constitutional amendment.
  • This creates a form of portability for homeowners who would otherwise lose significant tax savings when they move.
  • Rather than starting over with only a $25,000 homestead exemption and zero Save Our Homes protections, the homeowner would immediately have a homestead exemption up to $195,000 as soon as they move in.

 

  • Creates a new “Super Homestead” exemption to transform the inequitable Florida property tax system.
  • The new exemption covers 75% of the first $200,000 of value and 15% of the next $300,000.
  • Thus, the maximum super exemption is $195,000.
  •  All homesteads will receive at least a $50,000 exemption.
  • Qualifying low-income seniors will receive at least a $100,000 exemption.
  • The upper $500,000 threshold is indexed to grow with changes in Florida personal income, which generally increases 4% per year.

 

  • Authorizes a new $25,000 Tangible Personal Property (TPP) exemption for businesses.
  • This creates immediate savings of hundreds of dollars for TPP-paying business owners.
  • It also eliminates the administrative burden of filing a tax return for $1 million of Florida’s 1.3 million businesses that pay tangible personal.

 

  • Authorizes targeted relief for affordable housing and working waterfront properties. Implements tax reform and relief for 2008 tax bills, provided the Legislature votes for a special election in January 2008 (HB 5B).

 

 

HB 1B by Representative Attkisson Property Tax: Immediate Statutory Relief”

 

  • Creates meaningful and immediate tax relief for all properties in Florida this year.
  • Homestead property owners save an average of 7% ($174).
  • Non-homestead residential property owners save an average of 7% ($199).
  • Commercial/industrial property owners save an average of 6% ($941).
  • Tangible personal property taxpayers save an average of 6% ($92).

 

  • Requires all local governments except school districts to cut taxes this year.
  • First, cities, counties, and independent special districts must reduce taxes for the 2007-2008 Fiscal Year by adopting the 2006-2007 tax levy, adjusted for new construction (i.e., adopt the rolled-back rate).
  • Next, cities and counties must further reduce taxes by a factor based on whether they have recently levied property taxes responsibly or excessively, compared to a statewide average. The reduction factor will be 3%, 5%, 7%, or 9%.
  • All independent special districts are required to implement the 3% reduction factor.

 

  • Requires all local governments except school districts to cap annual property tax revenue growth.
  • Property tax revenue growth will only be allowed to increase in proportion to population growth (i.e., new construction) and growth of Florida personal income (which averages 4% annually).
  • A revenue cap creates unprecedented protections for all Florida properties – especially commercial properties and non-homestead residential properties, which currently have no specific protection.

 

  • Protects taxpayers while allowing local flexibility by requiring a rigorous procedure to override the required revenue cap.
  • Depending on the extent to which the local authority wants to exceed the revenue cap, varying supermajority votes are required.
  • A slight increase requires a 2/3 vote, while a larger increase will require either a unanimous vote or approval by local voters.

 

  • Implements provisions authorized in the constitutional reform plan (HJR 3B).
  • The implemented provisions are:
  • The new “super” homestead exemption.
  • The new homestead exemption for low-income seniors.
  • The grandfathering provisions that allow certain homeowners to maintain Save Our Homes benefits.
  • Homeowners will be allowed to choose between their current Save Our Homes protections or the new, “Super Homestead” and expanded taxpayer protections under the constitutional amendment.
  • The new tax protections for affordable housing.

                                                             _______________**________________

 

 

                                                                                         ____________**_____________

  • 09 Jun 07 A tax plan with specifics

Legislators propose rollbacks and expanded exemptions.

By ALEX LEARY and JENNIFER LIBERTO  The St. Petersburg Times


TALLAHASSEE -- Top lawmakers proposed the largest tax cut in Florida history Friday, a sprawling $31.6-billion plan that would trim the average bill by 7 percent this year and give homeowners significantly lower taxes in future years.

The five-year plan -- a blueprint for the special session that begins Tuesday -- was released just before 6 p.m. as a blizzard of numbers that seemed more reasonable than many had expected.

"You always fear the worst, but I'm pleasantly surprised and optimistic," said Pinellas County Commissioner Susan Latvala, who as president of the Florida Association of Counties has been a leading voice against drastic tax reductions.

"I think they listened to us, and they realize local governments provide vital services," she said.

The plan has two major components. One is a rollback of tax revenues for local governments, and the other is a sharp expansion of the state's homestead exemption.

The two pieces represent a hard-fought compromise between Senate President Ken Pruitt, who wanted to cut taxes more modestly, and House Speaker Marco Rubio, who wanted to swing a meat cleaver.

Gov. Charlie Crist praised the effort.

"It's looking very good to me," said Crist, who had earlier called for about $30-billion in cuts. "I'm very pleased and very grateful."

But the early optimism did not mask a concern, especially among business owners, that the plan is designed to give the biggest cuts to homesteaded property owners, who already enjoy exemptions under the current system.

It was commercial landowners, snowbirds and landlords who cried the loudest last summer for a break in property taxes because their bills have risen fastest. Yet, almost two-thirds of the new savings go to homesteaders.

"It seems that the leadership in Tallahassee is unable to grasp a simple principle," said 60-year-old Marty Altner of Clearwater, a landlord and tax reform advocate. "An EMS worker helps someone who is bleeding to death before someone with a flesh wound. It's idiocy."

And there were new fears Friday about cuts to local school budgets. While Pruitt and Rubio pledged to hold schools harmless in the tax deal, the proposal would cut school budgets by $7.1-billion over the next five years. Lawmakers will have to find a way to replace that money.

"This is very unsettling and gives us a queasy feeling," said Mark Pudlow, spokesman for the Florida Education Association. "It's kind of 'trust us' deal."

- - -

The biggest challenge politically will be winning approval in the Legislature for the new "super" homestead exemption. Tinkering with the homestead exemption, available only to primary residences, means changing the state Constitution. That requires a three-fourths majority in the House and Senate, plus voter approval.

Under the proposal released Friday, the current $25,000 flat exemption would be replaced by a system that provides a 75 percent exemption on the first $200,000 in home value. The next $300,000 would get an additional 15 percent exemption. So a home valued at $400,000 would be taxed on only $220,000.

A minimum exemption of $50,000 would be guaranteed.

Longtime homeowners who already have especially low tax bills because of the Save Our Homes cap on annual assessments would be allowed to keep their existing tax bill.

But passage is hardly a done deal. If lawmakers can agree during the special session, the proposal must still get 60 percent approval in a statewide referendum, tentatively scheduled for Jan. 29, the day of the presidential primary.

The heavy focus on homestead property owners could give rise to opposition from business groups who feel slighted. Aside from the local government rollback, businesses get relatively few benefits, including an exemption of $25, 000 in taxes on equipment.

The local government tax rate rollback will be easier to enact because it requires only a straight majority vote of the Legislature before being sent to the governor. Under the proposal, property tax revenues for city and county budgets for the coming fiscal year 2007-2008, which begins Oct. 1, would freeze at the current year's level.

Each local government would also have to make additional cuts to their property tax revenues of either 3, 5, 7 or 9 percent, depending on how much they had raised taxes between 2001 and 2006.

The rollback plan would generate an average saving for all property owners of about 6 or 7 percent in the first year.

Future tax revenue growth would be capped by the rate of personal income growth and population in a city or county. City and county elected officials could break the limitations through a supermajority vote.

While supporting the homestead exemptions, Democrats said the plan could still be doomed if the school budget problem isn't fixed.

"Now the state is going to step in and do the right thing?" asked Rep. Jack Seiler of Wilton Manors. "You're asking the taxpayers to take a leap of faith."

Times staff writers Steve Bousquet and Will Van Sant contributed to this report.

Fast facts: Homestead expansion
Lawmakers are proposing a new "super" homestead exemption. Here's how it would work:

  • Primary homes would get a tax exemption of 75 percent of the first $200,000 of the home's value, with a minimum exemption of $50,000.
  • The next $300,000 in value will get an additional 15 percent exemption.
  • Other details: homeowners whose tax bills are lower under the existing Save Our Homes program would be "grandfathered in" to keep the lower tax bill.

Fast facts: Proposed rollbacks
Lawmakers propose creating a five-tier system for rolling back city and county government budgets that follows a basic principle: The more a local government allowed taxes to rise with property values between 2001 and 2006, the steeper the rollback. Here's where local counties and cities would fare:

0 percent rollback: St. Leo, Belleair Shore and Temple Terrace

3 percent rollback: Pasco County and Safety Harbor

5 percent rollback: Hillsborough County, Indian Rocks Beach, Seminole, Plant City, Tampa, Pinellas Park, St. Petersburg, Tarpon Springs and Belleair

7 percent rollback: Pinellas County, South Pasadena, Kenneth City Dunedin, Port Richey, Clearwater and Oldsmar

9 percent rollback: Hernando County, Belleair Bluffs, San Antonio, Gulfport, St. Pete Beach, North Redington Beach, Belleair Beach, Largo, Madeira Beach, Treasure Island, Redington Beach, Redington Shores, Indian Shores and Weeki Wachee

                                                               _____________**_____________

 

 

  • 08 Jun 07

Dear Property Tax Reform Supporter:


I am excited to announce that an agreement has been reached between the House and the Senate on the tax cut levels for historic relief and reform package that will save Florida taxpayers $31.6 billion over the next five years.  This is, by far, the largest tax cut in Florida’s history. 

 

I cannot be more proud of the excellent work of our negotiating team and the valuable input from our respective legislative chambers.  Together, we are bringing forth a thoughtful and comprehensive plan that will give every property owner – homestead, non-homestead residential, and commercial/industrial – a tax cut this year. We are confident that when this plan is implemented, Floridians will finally have a more equitable tax system that will yield property tax bills that they can afford to pay. 

 

The details of the plan are provided below.  Thank you for continued involvement in this very important issue.  Please e-mail us at info@nomorepropertytax.com for more information.

 

Sincerely,

 

Marco Rubio

Speaker, Florida House of Representatives

 



$15.6 billion in Immediate Tax Relief and Reform (Statutory Changes)

 

  • Beginning this year, every category of property taxpayer will benefit from the cut and the cap that the statute imposes.
  • All cities and counties will be required to cut taxes in the upcoming 2007-2008 fiscal year to the 2006-2007 revenue levels.  These local governments will then be required to make an additional cut of 3%, 5%, 7% or 9%.  The level of cuts will be determined by a formula that analyzes their taxing performance over the past 5 years, measured against a statewide average.
  • Special taxing districts and fiscally limited cities and counties will be required to cut taxes to the 2006-2007 revenue levels and make an additional cut of 3%.
  • A cap on future property tax revenues (based on the rate of personal income growth and new construction) will be imposed to ensure that government cannot grow faster than personal income.
  • Local governments may override the cut and the cap.  The method for the override will vary based on the magnitude of the local government’s action (escalating from a supermajority vote of the local governing body, to a unanimous vote of the local governing body, to a referendum).

 

$16 billion in Further Tax Relief and Reform (Constitutional Amendment)

 

  • The estimated average savings for a homestead property (combining statutory and constitutional changes) will be $1,300 in 2008-2009.  This average savings represents a 44% reduction.
  • “Save our Homes” is replaced with a new “super exemption”.  An estimated 73% of homesteaded properties will receive a greater benefit under this new exemption.
  • The new “super exemption” will be as follows:
    • Level 1: Homestead Property will receive an exemption of 75% of the first $200,000 in value of the home.  The minimum exemption is $50,000 per homestead.
    • Level 2: In addition to Level 1, homestead property will obtain another 15% exemption for the next $300,000 in value.
  • We will grandfather the tax savings and assessment cap for the minority of property owners who have greater benefits under the current “Save our Homes” plan.
  • We will preserve all existing constitutional exemptions based on special circumstances, including those now provided to disabled veterans, low income seniors and agricultural lands.
  • Because the tax base for all taxing authorities will decline under the constitutional amendment, the fiscal analyses reflects a reduction in school funding.  We intend to hold schools harmless from these cuts.

 

Other Constitutional Changes

 

There has been agreement to address remaining issues such as additional relief to low income elderly taxpayers, offering incentives for affordable housing and providing tax reform for “working waterfronts” and small businesses.  Small businesses will receive a $25,000 tangible personal property tax (TPP) exemption resulting in a total exemption for $1 million of the 1.3 million businesses who must pay this tax.  Furthermore, those who receive a total exemption on their TPP will never have to file the burdensome paperwork associated with the tax again.

 

                                                                   ___________**_______________

 

  • May 16, 2007   Inside Florida's 'Tax Revolt'

Soaring Property Taxes Have Many in the Sunshine State Demanding Change

Tax Revolt
Homeowners in Florida — a state with no income tax — have been particularly hard hit by rising property taxes.Tax assessors base their judgments on real estate values, and in Florida, in just the last three years, property taxes have shot up about 50 percent statewide.  (Preston C. Mack/Getty Images)
From Nightline

Florida. The Sunshine State. America's own tropical delight — beautiful people with even more beautiful homes. But if you look behind that postcard image, you may find real trouble brewing in paradise.

In Florida, a storm is gathering over the state's soaring property taxes.

"If you have a significant difference between how much your taxes are going up and how much your income is going up, that is going to create a crisis very fast," said Marco Rubio, the state's young and ambitious speaker of the house. Over lunch with constituents in Miami, Rubio received an earful of complaints.

"I'm going to be working, I figure, 'til I'm 75 to pay my taxes," said Carol Kahn, a retired teacher.

Another constituent, Ignacio Mendez, said, "My tax base has gone up three times. I used to pay $4,000 and now I'm paying $12,000 a year in taxes."

And that, in a nutshell, is the crisis that now dominates the conversation in Florida. And drives the political career of Rubio, a 35-year-old Republican.

"It's the biggest issue in the state," he explained. "Usually people come to Florida to run away from the hassles, the cost of living of where they were from. And now they're telling us, 'You know, this is starting to look like the place that I came here to get away from,' and that's not the kind of talk we want to hear."

'Impossible to Move'

This problem is not unique to the Sunshine State. Tax protests are popping up in Michigan, Minnesota and Virginia, and testimonials from agitated homeowners are flooding the Internet.

But property owners in Florida — a state with no income tax — have been particularly hard hit. Tax assessors base their judgments on real estate values, and in Florida, in just the last three years, property taxes have shot up about 50 percent statewide as home prices have jumped.

Lori Parrish, the Broward County property appraiser, said that she has never seen taxpayers so angry. "I think the citizens are about to revolt in a way that you've never seen," she said. "[They are] fed up. And I think fed up with government spending in general — you can't outspend the public's ability to pay."

Those higher tax bills have left thousands of middle-class families financially trapped in their current homes.

"We bought our house 11 years ago," said Evan Feldman, who would like to trade up for the sake of his growing family, "and it's usually your starter house, you never think it's the house you could be in for 25, 30 years."

"It's a three bedroom house and we'd like to have a second child," said Laurie Feldman, Evan's wife, "and with the taxes, it makes it almost impossible to move."

The Feldmans said they feel trapped because, like all permanent Florida residents, their home property tax bills are capped to avoid dramatic increases. But only if they stay put. "We're not asking to go from something that's 1,600 square feet to something that's 3, 4, 5,000 square feet," said Evan. "These are people like myself that are looking for a couple of hundred square feet more, and they do feel trapped."

Middle Class Pushed Out

In Florida, a new owner of a home could easily pay three times more in property taxes than the owner of an identical home next door, who has lived there for several years.

"Soon, the only people who are going to be living here are the millionaires because the middle class are being pushed out," said Feldman. "The first time home buyers, pushed out. Retirees that want to downsize can't."

The higher taxes have their roots in a real estate market that began booming in 2004.

"Our sales prices for properties in 2004 to 2005 skyrocketed," said Parrish. "I mean there were bidding wars to pay more by buyers than the sellers were asking."

Then came the hurricanes. "Katrina came in the fall of 2005 and that slowed it back and then Wilma hit in October 2005 and devastated south Florida and Broward county," said Parrish. "People as far as 20 miles from the ocean had lost their roofs, fences — all sorts of damage."

All of a sudden, property owners were facing a double whammy: high taxes and higher insurance payments.

"The first insurance renewal premiums after Wilma skyrocketed…tripled, doubled, quadrupled. Scared people…" said Parrish. "The tax bills that people received in 2005 and 2006 were astronomical."

Hitting Bottom

After the hurricanes, the market cooled off quickly, and in Miami, a glut of unsold condominiums hangs over the city like a dark cloud.

"Yes, the real estate market was devastated," said Parrish. "Absolutely, the market was devastated, it hit bottom."

Now, the stalled real estate sales are also dragging down businesses that depend on housing just as their property tax bills have also shot through the roof.

All this has led Florida legislators like Rubio to consider radical changes. "I think the property tax is a horrible way to tax people," he said.

Rubio proposes eliminating the property tax and replacing it with a higher sales tax, an idea that ran into trouble when Democrats argued it would give the biggest breaks to the wealthiest homeowners.

Across Florida, local governments like the city of Delray Beach in Palm Beach County that have been raking in big bucks are now bracing for big budget cuts.

"I'm not saying we can't do without any of it," said David Harden, Delray Beach's city manager. "Think about your own family situation. How would you manage if your income suddenly dropped by 25 percent."

Some Cities Threaten Pushback

The city has already published a "hit list" of services it is threatening to reduce or eliminate if property taxes are cut back. That list includes nearly two dozen cops, fire station cutbacks, a brand new library, swimming pools, and even lifeguards at the beach. Rubio said he doesn't endorse these actions.

"That would be like my wife saying we're going to cut diapers and baby formula if I were to get a pay cut yesterday. Those are the last things you cut. And it shows what's wrong with the system," he said.

But would the Feldman family be willing to accept fewer services, poorer schools, or fewer firemen in exchange for lower taxes?

"Well, I don't know if our school systems could get any poorer," said Laurie Feldman. "And I have to ask the government, 'Where are all those tax dollars going?' A lot of my friends and neighbors are moving, reluctantly, to other states when they would prefer to stay here. And they can't afford it."

So, one way or another, the costs of living in paradise are going up. The painful choices ahead point to a showdown in the Sunshine State. And the bigger question is how far the tax revolt now under way there may spread.

 

             Back  to Top

For problems or questions regarding this web contact  webmaster@fofgroup.org

 

 

 

"cfof" are residents of Fernandina Beach, Florida.
 
Last updated: May 14, 2008.