Concerned Friends of Fernandina        

                    wpe3.jpg (29730 bytes)Copy of Downtown Streets.gif (83100 bytes)                  

                 Concerned Friends of Fernandina is a grassroots citizens group formed to inform and involve  residents wanting to

                 preserve the small town  identity of Fernandina Beach and its natural beauty.

Home Up

                     "With public sentiment, nothing can fail;  without it nothing can succeed." -- Abraham Lincoln

 

                 

   

      

 

 

       

 

 

 

Home
Up
                   

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back  to Top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cumberland Island page:

  • 29 Jun 08  More Threats, Save the North Atlantic Right Whale


Please read this important update about a serious threat to Cumberland Island

and her wildlife!!

I don't know if you are aware of the potential marinas that may be built at

the Cumberland Harbour development in St. Mary's.  If their permits are

approved, these marina will bring around 800+ more boats, some as large as 100

feet in length to the waters right around Cumberland, which are also one of the

few places that  North Atlantic right whales come every winter to birth their

calves.  There are only around 300-350 of these  whales left on earth and

collisions with boats are their #1 killer.  Another issue is that with this

large increase of boats, the potential for people mooring just off the beach on

Cumberland and coming on land is huge!  There is no way that the Park Service

has the funding or man power to police that many boats and in turn people

coming on to the Island.  The 200 person maximum per day on the Island ensures

the least amount of impact to the fragile ecosystem there and if dozens of

people trespass the result could be devastating.

I am in contact with David Kyler, the Executive Director of the Center for a

Sustainable Coast.  They are one of the environmental groups that brought the

lawsuit against the developers, Land Resource Co.  Currently under appeal by

the developer, the decision on the lawsuit is in the hands of the Georgia

Supreme Court.  A final decision must be made by January 2, 2009. 

I sent you all this petition that I started but realize that most of you

probably deleted it (I would have :) because you didn't know the deeper

issue associated with it.  The reason that I focused the petition on the

whales, is because the focus of the lawsuit is the filling of marshland for

development, which on a technicality may actually be in favor of the developer.

 My hope is to show the GA Supreme Court that beyond the marshland argument,

there is an even bigger threat to Cumberland and her wildlife. 

Please take a minute to sign the petition and send it on to others.  My goal is

to get at least 5000 signatures by Christmas.

Thanks so much!

Molly Prochazka

 

LINK TO PETITION --> right whales



 
 

 

                                                                                      _____________**__________

 

  • 02 Sep 06  Threatened again!
 Please pass this around, there is not alot of time.....
 
Cumberland Island is again threatened by legislatively mandated tours to the northern Historical District – take action to protect Cumberland Island today!

Cumberland Island National Seashore off the Georgia coast is one of the largest undeveloped barrier islands in the world. It offers a wilderness experience within 300 miles of several metropolitan areas including Atlanta, GA, and Orlando and Jacksonville, FL. More than 50,000 people visit Cumberland every year. Recent legislation threatens the very qualities that make Cumberland Island so valuable.

Public Law 108-447 was implemented December 2004 and removed portions of the island out of protective status to benefit private and commercial interests, setting a terrible precedent for wilderness everywhere and for our National Park system. In July of 2004, the 11th Circuit courts put an end to motorized vehicle traffic in Cumberland Island wilderness, but this legislation overturned that decision by changing boundaries and removing roads and beaches from Wilderness. This unfortunately opened the Wilderness to allow more traffic through the sensitive island.

The National Park Service is now in the process of developing a Transportation Management Plan to meet the legislatively mandated minimum of five and a maximum of eight tours per day to the northern end of the island to the historic district. While these tours are required by law, their details have not yet been decided upon. We still have the opportunity to determine the types of tours which should be offered, where they go, where they start from, types of vehicles used, extent and types of facilities to be used or possibly built, etc. so that we can minimize their most certain impact.

Your input on the scope of this Transportation Management Plan is needed by September 1, 2006. PLEASE submit your own comments online at the NPS Planning, Environment, and Public Comment website: http://Parkplanning.nps.gov
 
A sample message appears below, which you may edit before sending.

 


 


Dear Mr. Fry

As the National Park Service develops the scope of the Cumberland Island Transportation Management Plan to permit reasonable access to historical sites on the northern end of the island, as required by Public Law 108-447, please carefully consider the following recommendations in order to minimize impact on the environment, flora and fauna, in particular within the Wilderness areas and those areas immediately adjacent to Wilderness, so that the island’s character, spirit and primitive nature can be preserved to the fullest extent possible for future generations.

The guidelines below for the Transportation Management Plan are necessary to prevent abuse and to ensure minimal impact on the natural and historical resources of Cumberland Island.

1) Route
a) Origin/return: Sea Camp or Dungeness. There are already sufficient existing facilities.
b) Route: Travel on Main Road to wharf ruins, turn right, stop at historic sites, ending at hotel at High Point. Return by same. No traveling across the dunes or along the beach.
c) Prohibited areas: dunes, wilderness, beach, areas north of wharf ruins.

2) Visitor access
a) Guided tours only to Historic Districts.
b) Stops: No unsupervised or extended stops that would allow tour participants to wander into prohibited areas. [See 1c) above]
c) No one-way drop-off trips; round-trip guided tours only.
d) All tours by all concessionaires must abide by same guidelines.
e) No motorized side trips to Plum Orchard. Existing tours via ferry and foot are sufficient. Legislation mandates tours to the Historic District, not to Plum Orchard.

3) Mode
a) Electric or hybrid motorized vehicles only (electric preferred).
b) Smallest and quietest vehicle available. Recommend that the Park Service lease vehicles until tour demand is established to avoid unnecessary monetary outlays.
c) Speed limit recommended at 10-15 mph, compatible with current condition of road, to reduce noise, protect the road and avoid dangerous encounters with pedestrians and wildlife.

4) Support facilities
a) No additional facilities should be constructed. Maintain, upgrade or equip existing structures as needed to ensure health, safety and sanitation. Existing structures may be used for tours and for vehicle maintenance and storage.
b) No new visitor center anywhere on the Island. Additions at St. Mary’s visitor center only.
c) Interpretive signs and structures are really unnecessary with guided tours, but if considered, must be limited to within the boundaries of the historic districts. Please consider carefully the impact that additional structures may have, and minimize such. This should be one of the lowest priorities, if considered.
d) Create tour brochure to hand out, with multiple language inserts as necessary. A basic edition can be produced for no charge, a more expansive, glossy edition for sale.

5) Tour operations
a) Tours offered by Greyfield Inn to the northern Historic District shall be included in the count of the legally required trips to be offered daily.
b) The National Park Service should be the only concessionaire to offer these tours, with the exception of Greyfield Inn, who may continue to offer tours, in accordance with permit issued by the National Park Service, following all guidelines as other tours, including no beach driving.
c) Tour fees should cover the complete cost of the tours, including personnel, structures, vehicles, etc. If a “reasonable fee” does not cover total costs, the remainder must be covered by additional, separate funding from the Federal Government designated for this purpose, so as to not take funds away from other Park Service functions.
d) Tour costs must also include funding designated to enable the National Park Service to provide proper oversight of the tours and ensure compliance with all rules and regulations. Fines from violations may be applied to these funds.

I urge you to carefully consider any deviation from the above recommendations and the impact which the choices in the Transportation Management Plan will have for hundreds of years to come. The best action alternative is really No Action. However, since Public Law 108-447 does not appear to permit this alternative, please implement the above guidelines to preserve the natural heritage that Cumberland Island provides to all her visitors, present and future.

Please Keep Cumberland Island Wild!
 

Your name and address here

Click on the NPS site below and register your comments, or cut and paste the letter above in the site comment box.

NPS PEPC - External Scoping - Cumberland Island National Seashore Transportation Management Plan - Submit Comments

 

 


 

 
 

                                                                      __________**__________

  • 21 Feb 06 Across the River at Cumberland Harbour

Cumberland Harbor permit denial

  A very hopeful and rare environmental victory for the region. Few may be aware of this "sleeping giant" (largest proposed marinas in GA history) just north of Fernandina, but this ruling is a major victory and a firm break on that development.

We won!  Judge Malihi issued a strong ruling in our favor this morning. His decision focused on two of the (many) issues we presented – the fact that the Permit’s conservation measures were incomplete and the Committee’s failure to consider the impact of the development’s upland.  The opinion contains some very good language, particularly on the upland development issue, and will be useful to us in future case.    

This ruling means that the developer can’t build any of the structures described in the permit.  If the developer wishes to build their docks and marinas, they will have to once again apply for a permit from the Committee.  In considering this new application, the Committee must follow the court’s order both to consider the upland development and to ”consider, review and include” the finalized conservation measure in the new permit. If the developer appeals the legal ruling to a higher court (as we expect they will), nothing will happen until that appeal is resolved.  I have attached a copy of the decision if you would like to read it. Please contact me if you have any questions and I will keep you posted as this case continues to unfold.  

This was an important case and an important win for many reasons. Cumberland Harbour is a very large development and a high profile case, a case that presented many of the problems systematic in the permitting process.   We hope this decision will force the Committee to seriously consider these issues not only with respect to the Cumberland Harbour permit, but in every permit they issue in the future. I cannot thank both of you enough from your help.  Without your effort, time and expertise in preparing for the hearing and your willingness to testify, this decision simply would not have been possible. I hope that we will have the opportunity to work together again in the future.  

                                      ________**__________

  • 31 Dec 04  Congress votes to destroy the Cumberland Island Wilderness.
  •  National Park Service can operate tour jitney trains up and down the island.

 

Archives Click: (A) Cumberland Island

             Back  to Top

For problems or questions regarding this web contact  webmaster@fofgroup.org

 

 

 

"cfof" are residents of Fernandina Beach, Florida.
 
Last updated: October 20, 2011.